梳理新时期以来中国当代文学史发展脉络,众多的文学史研究者总是选择一种历时性的宏观社会历史框架作为文学研究的总体性原则和依据,将纷繁复杂的各种文学思潮作为社会历史进程的文学表象和文学隐喻进行线性的时间阐释,并形成一种惯性力量横亘在文学研究的肌体中。尽管这种阐释有其内在的合法性、合理性和科学性,但对文学本身的探寻缺乏应有的自觉性、精准性和深入性。在某种意义上,文学命脉中隐藏的是人类生命的私 Combing the development context of Chinese contemporary literary history since the new era, numerous literary history researchers always choose a diachronic macro-social historical framework as the general principle and basis for literary studies and regard various complicated literary trends as social history The process of literary representation and literary metaphor for linear time interpretation, and the formation of a force of inertia lie in the body of the literature study. Although this interpretation has its inherent legitimacy, rationality and scientific nature, the search for literature itself lacks due consciousness, accuracy and depth. In a sense, hidden in the lifeblood of literature is the private life of human beings