自从巴斯内特和勒菲弗尔提出翻译研究的文化转向之后,中国翻译研究的文化学派与语言学派之间就争论不断。文化学派聚焦文本以外的因素,关注翻译的结果和制约翻译选择的文化因素,而语言学派则聚焦文本。关注语言的转换过程,并为此而质疑文化学派的翻译研究,认为这种研究失去了本体,迷失了方向,翻译研究必须回归到文本研究。社会话语分析视域下的翻译研究通过对比原文和译文,提炼译者的主体性,并将译者主体性置于特定的社会历史背景中,考察语言背后的文化意义,进而揭示语言与社会之间的复杂关系。这一理论模式将文本分析与文化分析融合起来,对翻译进行综合考量,多层面、宽视域地揭示了翻译的语言和文化属性,成为翻译综合研究的典范。 Ever since Basnett and Lefebvre put forward the cultural shift in translation studies, there has been a constant debate among cultural schools and linguistic schools in Chinese translation studies. Cultural schools focus on factors beyond the text, focusing on the outcome of the translation and the cultural factors that constrain the choice of translation, while linguistic schools focus on the text. Concerned about the process of language conversion, and for this reason questioned the cultural studies of translation studies, that this study has lost the body, lost its way, translation studies must return to the text of the study. Translation Studies from the Perspective of Social Discourse Analysis By comparing the original text with the translation, the translator’s subjectivity is refined and the translator’s subjectivity is placed in a specific social and historical context to examine the cultural meanings behind the language and to reveal the relationship between language and society The complex relationship between. This theoretical model combines textual analysis and cultural analysis to make a comprehensive consideration of translation, revealing the linguistic and cultural attributes of translation in multiple dimensions and in a wide field of view, and serves as a model for the comprehensive study of translation.