公司僵局是公司治理和公司司法实务的一个难题,新公司法第183条为其解决指明了司法解散的救济路径。但是该条规定太过原则性,相关细节并不详实。本文就第183条中“严重困难”“重大损失”“其他途径”等规定提出质疑,阐述了自己的看法和观点,并对该条文没有明确的被告主体、股东持股时间限制等问题提出了建议。 Corporate deadlock is a difficult problem for corporate governance and corporate judicial practice. Article 183 of the new company law, for its solution, points out the remedy path for judicial dissolution. However, this article provides too principled, the details are not detailed. This article questions the provisions of Article 183 such as “serious difficulty”, “serious loss” and “other ways”, and expounds its own views and opinions. There is no clear subject of the defendant or shareholders’ shareholding Time limit and other issues put forward suggestions.