论文部分内容阅读
19世纪以来,“共同过错说”、“客观行为说”、“关联共同说”、“折中说”等关于共同侵权行为“共同性”的制度安排纷纷被学者们抛出,共同侵权行为的“共同性”也经历了由主观到客观的转变。但,各种学说利弊共存,至今仍没有一种理论能够成为共同侵权行为统一的基础,本文试抛开以“过错”或“行为”为考察点的传统方法论,尝试以“结果”为出发点和中心探讨共同侵权行为的“共同性”。
Since the 19th century, there have been many institutional arrangements on joint infringement and “commonality” such as “common fault”, “objective behavior”, “common”, “compromise” The “commonality” thrown out by scholars and jointly infringed also experienced a change from subjective to objective. However, all kinds of doctrines have the advantages and disadvantages of coexistence, and so far no single theory can become the basis of the common tort. This paper tries to put aside the traditional methodology that takes “fault” or “behavior” Results “as the starting point and center to explore ” commonality "of the common tort.