不要笼统地提报社“双轨制”,就是说,要给“双轨制”下一个科学的正确的定义。有一种说法,要“建立两套相应的机构和指挥系统,比如编委会、社委会。这两个运行轨道是平等的,同等重要的,在干部配套和机构设置方面应当一视同仁、职权相等。”我觉得如果把编委会和社委会作为报社的两架马车,或者说是两个车轮,搞不好是要出问题的。我讲一下四川日报的情况。文革前,四川日报既有社委会,又有编委会,中间还有一位秘书长协调。但编辑部和经理部门矛盾很大。经理部门有的人说,编辑部只会用钱,不会挣钱,靠工人养活;编辑部门有的人说,工厂离开了报纸, We should not mention the “dual track system” of the press generally, that is, give the correct definition of the next science under the “dual track system.” There is an argument that “two sets of corresponding agencies and command systems should be established, such as editorial boards and social committees. These two tracks of operations are equal and of equal importance. They should be equal in terms of cadre support and institutional arrangements with equal terms of reference ”I think that if we put the editorial board and the editorial board as the newspaper’s two wagons, or two wheels, it would be troublesome to do something wrong. Let me talk about the situation in Sichuan Daily. Before the Cultural Revolution, the Sichuan Daily not only had an editorial board but also an editorial board with a secretary-general coordinating it. But the editorial department and the manager department have a lot of contradictions. Some people in the management department said that the editorial department will only use money and will not earn money and rely on the workers to support it. Some people in the editorial department said that the factory left the newspapers,