比较文学学科自诞生至今,始终被人们投以极大关注,人们就围绕着该学科的危机问题存在着种种争议。作为一种开放式的文学研究,比较文学产生的初衷就是为了克服国别文学的狭隘目光,消除人为设置的边界障碍,实现世界范围内的文学流通,因而相较于一般文学研究具有更宽泛的内容。外延的不断扩大使得人们对比较文学学科内涵的把握不断发出疑问,其中关于学科边界模糊现象的纷争尤为突出。比较文学凭借着跨越性特征打破了僵守多年的正统学科分类界限,但这是否会引发其自身学科范围无节制的扩大与膨胀呢?本文试着探讨我们该从怎样的立足点出发调和二者矛盾,以便更好地理解这门学科。 Since the birth of comparative literature, it has always been cast great attention by people. There are various controversies surrounding the crisis of this subject. As an open literary study, comparative literature was originally designed to overcome the narrow vision of the national literature, eliminate the boundary barriers set by the people and achieve the worldwide circulation of literature, and thus has a broader content. The continuous expansion of the extension makes people keep questioning the connotation of the comparative literature discipline, among which the dispute about the fuzzy boundary of the subject boundary is particularly outstanding. Comparative literature, by virtue of its transgressive nature, has broken the boundaries of orthodox disciplines that have been stifling many years of orthodoxy, but does this lead to the expansion and expansion of the uncoercion of its own disciplines? This article attempts to explore from which foothold we should reconcile the two Contradictions in order to better understand this discipline.