在二十四史中,最值得做史事考证注释者,无疑是《宋史》和《明史》,其次是《唐书》和《元史》。《辽史》和《金史》则应广泛搜罗史料,亦可做史事考证注释。《宋史》卷帙最为庞大,记事最为芜杂,其错讹以成千上万加以形容,看来并不过分。若能做史事考证注释,将极大地便利于后来的治史者,可以省去他们许多精力和时间。然而如此巨大的工作量,绝非任何个人所能完成,必须合众人之力,成众人之手。若要从事此项工作,当然需要拟定一个工作体例,依个人不成熟的想法,今归纳为以下几点,仅供讨论和修改之用。一、原标点本《宋史》集中了许多学者之极大精力和智慧,其校 Among the twenty-four histories, the most worthy commentaries on historical research are undoubtedly “Song History” and “Ming History”, followed by “Tang Books” and “Yuan History.” “Liao History” and “Golden History” should be widely collected historical data, can also do historical research notes. “History of Songs,” the most voluminous scroll, the most miscellaneous notes, the error is described in thousands, it seems not too much. If you can do historical research notes, will greatly facilitate the later historians, you can save them a lot of energy and time. However, such a huge amount of workload must not be achieved by any individual and must be combined with the power of the people and become the hands of all. To do this work, of course, there is a need to draw up a working style which, according to the individual’s immature thoughts, is now summarized in the following points for discussion and amendment only. First, the original punctuation The “History of the Song” focused on the great energy and wisdom of many scholars, their school