论文部分内容阅读
永乐十三年《四书大全》、《五经大全》修成后,文献或载科举考试经书主《大全》,但更常见独尊《大全》编纂时所重朱熹、蔡沈等宋、元传注之说,后又频有士子不读《大全》之论,颇有出入。经本文考察,《大全》浩瀚繁重,不但备考吃力、不适用,且士子未能尽睹,购置不易。颁布未久,约在正统后,科场已逐渐改尊《大全》所重的朱、蔡等五部经注。用《大全》小注者,或被视为异说,遭到黜落。《大全》在科场独尊的地位显然已不复存在,故旧云《大全》为明两百余年功令所尊之记载,并非准确的实情。
After the completion of the “Four Books Daquan” and “The Five Classics and Encyclopedia” of Yongle in the thirteen years, the literature or the imperial examinations have been written by the bookkeeper “Daquan” but more often than not, such as Zhu Xi, Cai Shen, Said that after frequent scholar do not read “Daquan” theory, quite different. Through the inspection of this article, “Encyclopedia” vast and arduous, not only pro forma hard-working, not applicable, and the scholar failed to see, purchase is not easy. Promulgation has not been long, about orthodox, the test field has gradually changed the “Daquan” Zhu, Cai and other five Notes. With “Daquan” a small note, or be regarded as different, have been falling. “Encyclopedia” in the academic monologue apparently no longer exists, so the old cloud “Encyclopedia” for more than two hundred years Ming Gongzunzong records, not accurate facts.