综合护理干预在晚期肿瘤患者预防压疮中的效果

来源 :中国医药指南 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:girl_wang
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的 对综合护理干预在晚期肿瘤患者预防压疮中的效果展开分析?方法 纳入本科室接收的94 例晚期肿瘤患者作为研究对象,时间为2017 年8 月至2019 年3 月,随机分为对照组(n=47,给予常规护理方案)?试验组(n=47,在常规护理基础上给予综合护理干预)?对94 例晚期肿瘤患者护理满意度?生活质量?及焦虑抑郁情绪进行评估?结果 评价护理满意度,试验组满意度(97.87%)明显高于对照组(87.23%),P < 0.05?对比生活质量各指标,和对照组相比,试验组生活质量明显较好,P < 0.05?分析“,”Objective To analyze the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on prevention of pressure ulcers in patients with advanced cancer. Methods Ninety-four 94 patients with advanced tumors were enrolled in the undergraduate room August 2017 to March 2019, randomized into control group (n=47, given routine care protocol), experimental group (n=47, comprehensive care intervention with routine care as the basis point), and 94 patients with advanced tumors were assessed for care satisfaction, quality of life, and anxiety and depression. Results Evaluation of nursing satisfaction, the satisfaction of the experimental group was as high as 97.87%, which was higher than the control group (87.23%), which was more advantageous, P <0.05.Compared with the control group, the quality of life of the experimental group was significantly better, P <0.05. Compared with the control group, the SAS and SDS scores were better, P <0.05, and the difference was significant. The incidence of pressure ulcers was analyzed. The incidence of pressure sores in the experimental group was 1 case, the incidence rate was only 2.13%, which was higher than the control group 19.15%, P <0.05. Conclusion The implementation of comprehensive nursing interventions on the basis of conventional nursing programs for patients with advanced cancer can significantly improve their psychological state, significantly improve the quality of life of patients, and have significant clinical effects.
其他文献
目的 探讨对于精神分裂症的患者采取心理护理对于缓解其抑郁症状的效果?方法 将我院2018 年2 月至2019 年5 月收治的82 例精神分裂症合并抑郁症状患者随机进行分组,每组41 例?常规护理组予以常规护理对策,心理护理组在常规护理基础上针对患者的抑郁症状采取心理护理措施?比较两组抑郁症状缓解率?服药的依从性?住院时间以及护理前后的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分?阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)评分?结果 心理护理组抑郁症状缓解率高于常规护理组,P < 0.05?心理护理组HAMD 评分?PANSS
目的 探究肝硬化并食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血患者的护理效果?方法 选取116 例食管胃底静脉曲张破裂?合并肝硬化患者进行分组研究,观察组?对照组各58 例,对比两组护理效果?结果 与对照组相比,观察组日常生活能力评分明显提升(P 0.05),护理后较之对照组,观察组PSQI 评分?SAS 评分?SDS 评分均显著下降(P < 0.05)?观察组护理总满意度为98.28%,对照组为86.21%(P < 0.“,”Objective To explore the nursing effect of patie