论文部分内容阅读
确认马克思的哲学世界观是实践的唯物主义,强调要以实践唯物主义为指针,去分析厉史上和现实生活中种种思想现象,这些,正在越来越广泛的范围内成为我国哲学界的共识。但是,在这个过程中,也存在一些相反的、倒过来的情况,这就是:用历史上曾经发生过的对于马克思的自然主义或唯实践主义的偏离,去解释马克思的实践唯物主义。在这方面,1989年7月11日《光明日报》发表的李惠斌同志《葛兰西对马克思哲学思想的理解》(以下简称李文),就是一篇代表作品。因为它不是以实践唯物主义为指针,去剖
Confirming Marx’s philosophical worldview as a practical materialism and stressing that using practical materialism as a guideline to analyze various ideological phenomena in the history of Li and the real life are becoming the consensus of our philosophical circles in an increasingly wider context. However, there are some contradictions in the process, the other way round. This is the explanation of Marx’s practical materialism from the deviation of Marxist naturalism or pragmatism that has ever happened in history. In this regard, Comrade Li Huibin, published by Guangming Daily on July 11, 1989, entitled “Gramsci’s Understanding of Marxist Philosophical Thought” (hereinafter referred to as Li Wen) is a representative work. Because it is not based on the practice of materialism, to dissect