1978年以后,我国为了迅速重建市场财产体系,只能依靠人为理性的快速建构,历史地选择了物权/债权的二元区分财产权结构。总体来看,这一结构既有历史前见提供的路径依赖,又符合日常经验的常识认知,也能满足资产阶级革命的时代需要以及现代交易的正当保护要求,因此具有历史、经验以及逻辑的自洽性,从整体结构上应予保存。与此同时,随着市场经济的深入带来的复杂交往互动,这一典范式结构也从产生、变化阶段走向质疑阶段,受到了不绝的批评,基于其内在理论冲突、外生“中间权利”现象以及逻辑推演规则应用中的诸多矛盾,必须对现有物权/债权的僵硬区分标准予以改造。为此,有必要在现代权利话语语境下,以“义务人的知晓”作为物权逻辑链的新支撑,通过三个层次的默示外观反向推理方法重新建立物权的判断标准。同时,可借以实现私人意思判断坐标的转换,以权利人本人的意思与权利相对人的意思相互制约、互动并行。 After 1978, in order to quickly rebuild the market property system, our country can only rely on the rapid construction of man-made rationality and historically chose the binary distinction of property rights / claims. In general, this structure has both historical and historical path of dependence and common sense of daily experience. It can also meet the needs of the times of the bourgeois revolution and the legitimate protection requirements of modern transactions. Therefore, this structure has historical, empirical and logical implications Self-consistency, from the overall structure should be preserved. At the same time, with the complicated interactions brought about by the deepening of market economy, this paradigmatic structure has also been criticized from the stage of emergence and change to the stage of questioning. Based on its internal theoretical conflict and exogenous Rights "phenomenon and the logic of the application of the rules of the many contradictions, must be the existing real right / creditor’s right to distinguish the rigid standard to be transformed. Therefore, under the context of modern rights discourse, it is necessary to use the knowledge of obligor to be the new support of the logical chain of property rights, and to reestablish the judgment of property rights through three levels of reverse appearance reasoning . At the same time, we can realize the transformation of the judgment of private meaning to coordinate with the meaning of the obligee and the objection of the opposite person.