相较于二审法官,一审民事法官的工作较多地集中于事实认定上,而精准的事实认定离不开科学的事实争点整理工作。在这个层面上,说事实争点整理是基层民事法官的一门必修课,是不为过的。这些琐碎的工作,表面上看起来对审判结果影响不大,深究下去,却关乎当事人的切身权利,与诉讼公正与效率的实现密切相关。但是,一方面,我国民事诉讼理论界对事实争 Compared with the second instance judge, the first instance of civil judge’s work is more focused on the fact that the confirmation, and accurate fact that can not be separated from the fact that scientific facts are arranged. At this level, it is not an exaggeration to say that the arrangement of facts and disputes is a required course for civil judges at the grassroots level. These trivial tasks apparently have little effect on the outcome of the trial. Going further, it is about the vital rights of the parties concerned and is closely related to the realization of litigation justice and efficiency. However, on the one hand, our theory of civil litigation disputes the facts