论文部分内容阅读
目的比较不同黄体支持对先兆流产治疗的疗效。方法对73例妊娠早期先兆流产患者随机分组,肌注黄体酮针剂组30例,阴道用黄体酮软胶囊组20例,口服地屈孕酮组23例,观察肌注组、阴道用药组和口服药组的保胎成功率。结果 73例患者中共61例保胎成功,肌注组保胎成功率83.3%,阴道用黄体酮软胶囊组80%,口服地屈孕酮组23组保胎成功率82.6%,三组比较无显著差异,(P>0.05)。患者的耐受满意度口服组明显高于阴道用药组和肌注组。结论阴道用药、口服和肌注孕酮对治疗先兆流产均有良好疗效,患者对于口服给药的耐受满意度最高。
Objective To compare the curative effects of different luteal support on threatened abortion. Methods Seventy-three cases of threatened abortion during early pregnancy were randomly divided into three groups: intramuscular injection of progesterone injection group (30 cases), vaginal progesterone-loaded soft capsule group (20 cases) and oral flexorone injection group (23 cases) The miscarriage success rate of the drug group. Results Among the 73 patients, 61 cases were successfully miscarried, the success rate of miscarriage in intramuscular injection group was 83.3%, that in vaginal progesterone soft capsule group 80% and that of oral progesterone group 82% Significant difference (P> 0.05). Patient’s tolerance satisfaction oral group was significantly higher than the vaginal medication group and intramuscular injection group. Conclusions Vaginal, oral and intramuscular injection of progesterone have a good effect in the treatment of threatened abortion, patients with the highest satisfaction for oral administration of tolerance.