论文部分内容阅读
在“执行难”仍然是制约目前法院工作的瓶颈的情况下,北京市一家基层法院在对该院近五年来全部“中止执行”的“骨头案”的“执行难”成因的调查研究发现:被执行人下落不明和确无给付能力的“不能执行”是“执行难”的最大成因,占全部执行中止案件的70％以上。其中,被执行人下落不明的占27％;被执行人确无财产可供执行的“不能执行”竟占45％。 现在,法院尝试建立申请执行人救济制度,告别“法律白条”。
In the context of the “difficult implementation” still restricting the bottleneck of the current court work, a grass-roots court in Beijing is having difficulty in enforcing the “burglary case” of all the “suspended executions” of the hospital in the past five years “Cause of the investigation and study found that: the whereabouts of unknown and indeed incapacitated ” can not be executed “is ” the implementation of hard “the biggest cause of formation, accounting for more than 70% of the total implementation of the suspension of the case. Among them, the whereabouts of unknown persons accounted for 27%; the executors did not have the assets to implement ”non-executive“ accounts for 45%. Now, the court tried to establish a system of applying for the remedy of executors, bid farewell to the ”legal white ".