论文部分内容阅读
作为哲学家的德里达以《割礼忏悔》践行了一次奇特的文学行动。这是一部关于身世、秘密、悼亡、祈祷的作品,既有深刻的哲学维度,又富含文学的感性,对信仰、传统、体裁、叙事等不断进行着叩问和解构。我们将通过文本细读的方式,从割礼与盟约、自传体裁、忏悔对象和秘密书写几个方面对作品巨大的模糊性进行辨析。作者从割礼的主题出发,展开了对神学和奥古斯丁忏悔录的沉思,又在互文性中融入极度个人化的经验,引出忏悔对象的不确定性,并最终指向文学根本的不可读性和异质性。文学作为“行动”的“述行性”由此凸显。割礼这一宗教习俗则在文本的细密编织中转化为文学书写与生命经验的生动隐喻。
Derrida, as a philosopher, practiced a peculiar literary course with “circumcision.” This is a work on lifetime, secret, mourning and praying. It has both profound philosophical dimensions and rich literary sensibilities. It continuously interrogates and deconstructs faith, tradition, genre and narration. We will analyze the huge vagueness of the works from the aspects of circumcision and covenant, autobiographical genre, repentance object and secret writing through textual reading. Starting from the theme of circumcision, the author embarks on the contemplation of theology and Augustine’s confessions, and in the intertextuality, integrates the extremely personal experience, leads to the uncertainty of the object of repentance, and finally points to the unreadability and difference of literary fundamentals Qualitative. Literature as “action ” “descriptive ” thus highlight. The religious practice of circumcision translates into a vivid metaphor of literary writing and life experience in the fine weaving of texts.