论文部分内容阅读
目的比较小儿麻醉中喉罩全麻与气管插管麻的效果。方法将我院收治的38例行喉罩麻醉患儿作为观察组,将同期收治的38例行气管插管全麻患儿作为对照组,对两组患儿临床资料进行回顾性分析,对比两组共76例患儿的麻醉控制点血流动力(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)以及并发症状况。结果观察组拔管时间、清醒时间显著短于对照组,观察组血流动力学稳定状况显著优于对照组,对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论喉罩麻醉较气管插管麻醉苏醒时间短,血流动力学更加稳定,且操作简单,值得临床推广。
Objective To compare anesthesia in anesthesia laryngeal anesthesia and intubation anesthesia effect. Methods 38 cases of laryngeal anesthesia children admitted to our hospital as observation group, the same period treated 38 cases of tracheal intubation general anesthesia as a control group, the clinical data of two groups were retrospectively analyzed, compared with two A total of 76 children with anesthesia control point of blood flow (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and complications. Results The extubation time and awake time in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group. The hemodynamic stability in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group, with significant difference (P <0.05). Conclusion Laryngeal mask anesthesia than tracheal intubation anesthesia wake time is short, hemodynamics more stable, and the operation is simple and worthy of clinical promotion.