论文部分内容阅读
目的对比分析介入栓塞术和开颅术治疗脑动脉瘤的疗效。方法将116例脑动脉瘤患者随机均分为两组,开颅组患者应用开颅手术进行治疗,介入组患者应用介入栓塞术进行治疗,对比两组患者疗效。结果介入组经治疗治愈率显著高于开颅组,致残率和死亡率均显著低于开颅组,组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论应用介入栓塞术治疗脑动脉瘤疗效较好,致残率和死亡率较低,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To compare the curative effect of interventional embolization and craniotomy on cerebral aneurysm. Methods One hundred and sixteen patients with cerebral aneurysm were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in craniotomy group were treated by craniotomy. Patients in intervention group were treated with interventional embolization. The curative effect was compared between the two groups. Results The intervention rate of intervention group was significantly higher than that of craniotomy group, and morbidity and mortality were significantly lower than those of craniotomy group. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The treatment of cerebral aneurysm by interventional embolization is effective, with low morbidity and mortality, which is worthy of clinical application.