从以1803年的美国“马伯里诉麦迪逊案”为开端的违宪审查制度,到二战后该制度在欧洲大陆的普及发展,再到初步形成具有中国特色、自成体系的违宪审查体制,这一制度已经有了两百多年的发展历史。但这并不意味着我国已经具备相对完善的违宪审查制度,本文主要通过对西方各国不同模式的违宪审查制的比较分析,探究其对我国制度发展的借鉴意义。 From the system of unconstitutional review starting from the case of the U.S. “Marbury v. Madison” in 1803 to the popularization and development of the system after World War II in continental Europe, and then to the initial formation of an unconstitutional review system with Chinese characteristics and its own system System, this system has been more than two hundred years of development history. However, this does not mean that our country already has a relatively complete review system of unconstitutionality. This paper mainly explores its reference to the development of China’s system through the comparative analysis of the unconstitutional censorship systems of different modes in Western countries.