论文部分内容阅读
面对归纳的两难境地,波普尔以反逻辑实证主义的思维方式,提出了否定后件的证伪主义。从证伪主义出发,他希望通过对归纳问题的消解来解决归纳问题。他的思想有很大的局限性。首先,科学研究不可能排除使用归纳法;另外,证实与证伪在本质上是一致的,假说的基础说不清楚,而且人们在实践中最终还是需要经证实的假说。这些都足以说明波普尔的证伪主义并没有真正解决归纳问题。
In the face of the inductive dilemma, Popper put forward the negative falsification doctrine in the anti-positivist way of thinking. Starting from falsification, he hopes to resolve the problem of induction through the resolution of the problem of induction. His thinking has great limitations. First of all, scientific research can not exclude the use of induction; In addition, the confirmation and falsification are essentially the same, the basis of the hypothesis is not clear, and people ultimately need to confirm the hypothesis in practice. These are enough to show that Popper’s falsificationism did not really solve the problem of induction.