论文部分内容阅读
2000年 12月 26 日.由文化部艺术司主办、中国画研究院承办的“全国画院工作座谈会”召开.60余位包括各省市级画院院长甚至部分省市文化厅局、文联领导人在内的代表齐集北京,共同探讨画院的现状与前景。在此之前一个月,本刊编辑会议中拟订出在2001年度做一期以“画院”为观察对象的选题。两者的不谋而合令主持者顿觉“有话可说”。于是届时亲赴会场,耳闻目睹之中.获得本栏中几种想法、观点不尽相同的文章。除此之外.本刊一以贯之的学者视角、学术态度亦不放弃,邀得相关或不相关.但都对这一话题“有话想说”的学者以及“院内人”、“院外人”也来说道说道.最终取得了多层次、多角度的观察结果.从而实事求是地透视“画院”,找到问题,会诊痛处,给出处方。邀约、收集、整理稿子的过程现在感觉,并不像只是完成一个选题那么简单,而真正感觉到作为媒体,在关注现实问题的同时.可以以自己的方式切入现实。这种感觉二好。 主持人 徐翎
December 26, 2000. Sponsored by the Arts Department of the Ministry of Culture and hosted by the Chinese Painting Research Institute, “Workshops of National Painting Academies” were held. More than 60 people, including chiefs of provincial and municipal art academies and even provincial and municipal cultural departments, Representatives gathered in Beijing to jointly explore the status quo and prospects of art academy. In the month prior to this editorial, we compiled a selection of topics to be considered as “art academy” in 2001. The coincidence of both make the host feel “there is something to say.” Then went to the venue, heard and saw in. Get several ideas in this column, the views of different articles. In addition, we have consistently given scholarly views and academic attitudes without giving up and inviting related or irrelevant sources, but scholars who “have something to say” about this topic, as well as “insiders” and “outsiders” Said finally, and finally obtained the multi-level and multi-angle observation results, so as to seek a realistic perspective on the “Painter’s House”, find the problems, diagnose the pain points and give prescriptions. The process of soliciting, collecting and arranging manuscripts does not feel as simple as just completing a topic, but it truly feels as a media, while paying attention to realistic problems, and can approach reality in its own way. This feeling is good. Host Xu Ling