论文部分内容阅读
有些人竟然想在武訓身上找出一條掃除文盲的道路来,硬说武训是“為無產階級而生”和“為无產階級而死”的“偉大的社会教育家”(“千古奇丐”的作者);“勞動人民文化翻身的旗幟”(董渭川);而孫瑜先生則認为攝製“武訓傅”的頭等價值,正是为了這个(編導“武訓传”記)。這有一點点是近乎事實的嗎?没有,完全是无稽之談。中國勞動人民的文化翻身事業,走着自己革命的道路,而不是走武訓投降的道路。中國解放區二十多年來工農群衆教育的經驗,早已證明了勞動人民必
Some people even want to find a way out of illiteracy in Wu Xun and insist that Wu Xun is “a great social educator” who “gave birth to the proletariat” and “dies for the proletariat” (“ The author of the book ”Beggar“); ”Banner of Working People’s Turning Over of Culture“ (Dong Weichuan); and Mr. Sun Yu believes that it is for this purpose that the filming of ”Wu Xun Fu" was made. Is this almost factual? No, it’s completely nonsense. Instead of following the path of taking military training and surrender, the working people of China has embarked on the road of revolution for their own culture. The experience of the masses of workers and peasants in the liberated areas in more than 20 years has already proved that the working people must