论文部分内容阅读
现场笔录作为行政诉讼特有的证据种类,一般具有优势证明力。其优势证明力源于严格的制作程序和对案件现场情况的全面固定。现场笔录在执法实践中存在制作主体不具备执法权、非“现场”制作、告知和阅签程序瑕疵以及笔录内容不规范等问题。在法律规范上,存在告知程序规范“缺失”、阅签程序规范“混乱”以及笔录内容规范“概括”等问题。因此,在程序方面,必须对表明身份与申请回避、告知与宣读程序、当事人参与和签名确认程序等进行规范。在实体方面,必须对现场笔录主体的基本要求及权力限制、现场笔录内容的一般要素与具体要求等进行规范。
Site transcripts as a kind of evidence specific to administrative litigation, generally have the strength to prove. The strength of its proof of force stems from the strict production procedures and the overall situation of the case on the scene. On-site transcripts in law enforcement practice exist in the production of the main do not have the right to law enforcement, “scene ” production, notification and signing procedures flaws, and transcripts of non-standard content and other issues. In terms of legal norms, there are issues such as notifying procedural norms, “missing”, reading program specifications “confusion ” and transcript content specifications “generalization ”. Therefore, on the procedural aspect, it is necessary to regulate the procedures of identification and application avoidance, notice and readout, party participation and signature verification. As for the entity, the basic requirements and limitations on the subject of the scene transcript, the general elements and specific requirements of the content of the transcript on the spot must be standardized.