论文部分内容阅读
林则徐禁烟斗争的策略问题是史学界鲜有涉述的课题。去年,罗耀九、郑剑顺同志在其《林则徐在禁烟斗争中的策略得失》(载《岭南文史》八五年第一期,以下简称罗、郑文)一文中,作了甚为详尽的分析。然而笔者对其观点实在不敢苟同,今特以此文与罗、郑两同志商榷。一、林则徐把“重治吸食为先”之策变为以“断绝鸦片为首务”是否合理? 罗、郑文认为,林则徐到广州之后把他以前的“重治吸食为先”之策改为以“断绝鸦片为首务”是错误的做法。笔者认为,林则徐这种策略的转变并非错误,它是由具体的客观条件所决定的,而不是林则徐随心所欲的意志体现。具体理由如下。笔者认为,“重治吸食为先”和“断绝鸦片为首务”此二策在其相应的阶段上都是必需实行
The strategy of Lin Zexu's fight against smoking is a topic rarely covered in history. Last year, Comrade Luo Yiu-kiu and Zheng Jian-shun made a very detailed analysis in his article “The Gains and Losses of Lin Zexu's Strategy in the Anti-smoking Campaign” (the first issue of the Lingnan Literary History in 1985, hereinafter referred to as Luo and Zheng Wen). However, I do not agree with this point of view. This article is hereby discussed with Luo and Zheng comrades. First, after Lin Zexu changed the policy of “treating smoking heavily first” to “cutting off opium as the chief task” Luo and Zheng Wen considered that after Lin Zexu's visit to Guangzhou, he changed his previous policy of “treating smoking heavily first” to “ The opiate decimation is the wrong thing. The author believes that Lin Zexu's transformation of this strategy is not wrong, it is determined by the specific objective conditions, rather than the will of Lin Zexu free will. Specific reasons are as follows. In my opinion, the two policies of ”recuperating smoking first“ and ”cutting off opium as the prime minister" are all necessary at the corresponding stages