论文部分内容阅读
目的:探究剖宫产瘢痕妊娠吸宫术与双腔尿管球囊压迫止血效果。方法:选取2013年3月~2016年3月我院收治的剖宫产瘢痕部分妊娠患者20例为研究对象,随机分为实验组与对照组,两组患者各10例。其中对照组为药物治疗后吸宫,实验组吸宫术后局部球囊压迫止血,对比分析两组患者的临床疗效。结果:两组患者均治疗成功,未出现大出血情况,治疗总有效率均为100%,对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组治疗方案在出血量情况无明显差异,实验组住院时间短于对照组。结论:针对剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者采用药物治疗后吸宫与吸宫术后予双腔尿管球囊压迫止血疗法均能够达到治疗效果,但双腔尿管球囊压迫止血疗法住院时间短、费用低。
Objective: To investigate the effect of cesarean scar pregnancy aspiration and double-lumen catheter embolization. Methods: From March 2013 to March 2016, 20 pregnant women with partial cesarean section who were treated in our hospital were selected as experimental subjects and randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 10 cases in each group. The control group was treated with inhalation after drug treatment, and the local anesthesia was performed by the experimental group after hemorrhage. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared and analyzed. Results: The two groups of patients were successfully treated without major bleeding, the total effective rate was 100%, the difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05); two groups of treatment programs in the amount of bleeding no significant difference in the experimental group hospitalized Time is shorter than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean scar pregnancy patients treated with drug therapy can not achieve the therapeutic effect after double-lumen catheter embolization and double-lumen catheter occlusion hemostasis therapy. However, double-lumen catheter balloon hemostasis has a shorter hospital stay, Low cost.