“座位”之“位”,显然与“座”字极不协调:以“人”“立”构形的“位”,明显是个会意字,而“人”既然已经“立”了,又与“座”有什么相干?追溯到古文字,则可发现,“位”字原本竟然还与“立”二位一体,即一个“立”,既可读为li,表示“站立”,又可读成w(?)i,表示“位置”。古文字中的“立”,又写作(?),分明是一个人正面站立的形象。由此我们可以领悟,“位”字的本义与“座”并没有什么关系。 The “seat” of the “seat” is obviously incompatible with the word “seat.” The “position” formed by “person” and “立” is obviously a knowing word. Since “person” has already been “established” What does “seat” have to do with it? Tracing back to the ancient writing, we can find that the word “b” is actually still associated with the “standing” one, that is, a “standing” Into w (?) I, said “location.” The ancient writing “legislation”, but also writing (?), Clearly a positive image of an individual standing. From this we can understand that the original meaning of “BIT” is not related to “Block”.