我国的区际司法协助,内地与港澳采“安排模式”、大陆与台湾地区采“单向分别立法结合双向协议”模式。尽管模式不同,表面上的属性不同,内地与港澳、大陆与台湾的司法文书送达,主要依托公权力进行。不同模式下的送达规定互有异同、各有不足。“安排”和“双向协议”的共同特点是双边协商、分别执行,最高人民法院通过单方改进做法,制定司法解释以解决司法文书送达的困难,但也引发如何理顺协商与执行问题的思考。我国区际送达应利用多种途径,且进一步提高委托送达效率。 China’s inter-regional judicial assistance, the mainland and Hong Kong and Macao mining “arrangement model ”, the mainland and Taiwan mining “one-way legislation with two-way agreement ” model. Despite the different modes and superficial attributes, the judicial instruments of the Mainland, Hong Kong, Maucao, the Mainland and Taiwan served mainly on public powers. Different modes of delivery provisions similar to each other, each has its own shortcomings. The common characteristic of “arrangement ” and “two-way agreement ” is that bilateral negotiation is carried out separately and the Supreme People’s Court makes unilateral improvement measures to formulate judicial interpretations to solve the difficulties of serving judicial documents, Reflections on implementation issues. Regional delivery in our country should take a variety of ways, and further enhance the efficiency of commissioned delivery.