本问题共收到评析稿件6篇,比较一致的看法是:学生提供的证法是不正确的,并没有在假设结论不成立时推得合理的矛盾,实际上没有完成原问题的证明.观点1的分析基本正确但没有剖析证明过程中的本质错误,而观点2是错误的.来稿前三名的作者是:王安寓(江苏省南京市六合实验高级中学),汪长银(安徽省太湖县大石初 This question received a total of 6 articles for review and analysis. The more consistent view is that the evidence provided by students is not correct, and no reasonable contradiction was deduced when the hypothetical conclusion did not hold. In fact, the proof of the original question was not completed. Analysis of the basic correct but did not analyze the proof of the essence of the process of error, and the point is wrong 2. The authors of the top three contributions are: Wang Anyi (Nanjing Liuhe Experimental High School, Jiangsu Province), Wang Changyin (Taihu Lake, Anhui Province