论文部分内容阅读
哲学和心理学在如今的当代已然是两门完全独立的学科,甚至双方对于彼此都是讳莫如深,两者之间的关系显得既尴尬又千丝万缕。哲学作为知识的起源,可以说是一个培养基,从此各门科学应运而生,物理学、化学、心理学等等。当各种基础性学科拥有了各种科学工具,开始用实证的方法武装自己,当物理学在讨论公式、心理学在讨论实验数据时,哲学似乎显得虚无缥缈了些,然而事实并非如此。早时的形而上学对于心理判断总是怀着怀疑与含糊的态度,当现代西方哲学面临科学危机,开始拒斥形而上学,它要如何寻找出路?而心理学作为一门新兴科学,根基薄弱,它又如何巩固发展呢?本文以维特根斯坦的后期哲学为例探讨现代西方哲学中心理学问题的可解决性。
Nowadays, philosophy and psychology are already two completely independent disciplines, and even the two sides are closely guarded about each other. The relations between the two seem embarrassing and inextricably linked. As the origin of knowledge, philosophy can be said to be a medium, from then on all kinds of science came into being, physics, chemistry, psychology and so on. When various fundamental disciplines have all kinds of scientific tools and begin to arm themselves with empirical methods, philosophy appears to be nothing more than truth when discussing formulas in psychology and experimental data in psychology, but this is not the case. Early metaphysics was always suspicious and vague about psychological judgments. When modern Western philosophy faced a scientific crisis and started to reject metaphysics, how should it find a way out? As a newly emerging science, psychology is fundamentally weak. How to consolidate the development? This article takes Wittgenstein’s later philosophy as an example to discuss the solvability of the psychology problems in modern western philosophy.