论文部分内容阅读
在近代中国的“转型时期”(1895—1925)中,思想界对于现代性的争论,其主流意见常常有以激进主义的形式,来宣扬普遍主义现代性的倾向。相对于此,多元主义现代性的论点,则多半被当成保守主义(或甚至是反动主义)。研究20世纪初年的“欧战”(1914—1918)对中国的影响,重新检讨以《东方杂志》和《新青年》杂志为代表的民初中国思想界对现代性的两种观点,可以更深入地认识此一对立论述在思想史上的主要意义。
In modern China’s “Period of Transformation” (1895-1925), the mainstream opinion of the ideological community for the debate on modernity often tended to promote the universalism’s modernity in a radical form. In contrast, the pluralist notion of modernity is mostly regarded as conservatism (or even reactionary). Studying the impact of the “European War” (1914-1918) in the early 20th century on China and re-examining the two kinds of views on modernity of the Chinese intellectual community in the early Republic of China, represented by Oriental Magazines and New Youth magazines , We can get a deeper understanding of the main significance of this opposite argument in the history of ideas.