论文部分内容阅读
目的对比采用氧驱动雾化吸入和空气压缩泵雾化吸入对于小儿哮喘的疗效。方法 84例哮喘患儿,随机分为对照组和观察组,各42例。对照组给予空气压缩泵雾化吸入,观察组给予氧驱动雾化吸入,对比两组临床疗效、各项临床症状消失时间和住院时间。结果观察组疗效优于对照组,且呼吸困难、胸闷咳嗽、反复喘息消失时间和住院时间均短于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论相比于空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗,氧驱动雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘能够明显提高临床疗效,缓解患儿临床症状,缩短住院时间,值得推广。
Objective To compare the efficacy of aerosol inhalation and aerosol pump aerosol inhalation for pediatric asthma. Methods Eighty-four asthmatic children were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 42 cases in each group. Control group was given inhalation of air compression pump inhalation, the observation group were given oxygen inhalation inhalation, compared two groups of clinical efficacy, the disappearance of clinical symptoms and hospital stay. Results The observation group was better than the control group, and the shortness of breath, chest tightness and cough, repeated wheezing disappearance time and hospitalization time were shorter than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with aerosol inhalation therapy by air compression pump, oxygen-driven atomization inhalation can significantly improve clinical efficacy, alleviate the clinical symptoms and shorten the hospital stay, which is worth promoting.