论文部分内容阅读
本文通过向读者推介《方志资料审核论稿》一书,抒发作者对做学问要有求真务实的精神和实事求是的态度的学术主张。本文认为时下理论研究中存在“膨化”现象,热衷于空洞的理论叙述,而对辨别资料真伪、考证史料正误工作不够重视,以至于影响了志书的质量。方志界对待志书中的错误有积极与消极两种态度。作者以《方志资料审核论稿》为例,论述了方志资料审核的目标、内容、要点。同时阐发了对首轮志书质量、主编的文化素质、修志工作者的职业道德的一些看法,并对志书资料工作中的经验教训以及造成入志资料出现谬误的原因进行了详细论述。
In this paper, readers are invited to introduce the book, “Review of Manuscripts for the Examination of Local Records,” to express the author’s academic position of seeking truthfulness and pragmatism and seeking truth from facts. This paper argues that there is a “puffing” phenomenon in theoretical research nowadays, keen on empty theoretical narration, and it does not pay enough attention to distinguishing the authenticity of materials and researching the correctness and error of historical materials. There are two positive and negative attitudes toward the errors in the book of calligraphies. The author uses the “Local Records Audit Documents” as an example to discuss the target, contents and key points of the local records review. At the same time, it expounds some views on the quality of the first round of journal books, the cultural qualities of editors, and the professional ethics of the practitioners. The author also expounds in detail the experiences and lessons learned in the information work of the journal books and the reasons for the fallacy of the information into records.