论责令改正在种子执法中的适用

来源 :种子世界 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:ziguangguo
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
《中华人民共和国行政处罚法》(以下简称《行政处罚法》)第二十三条规定:“行政机关实施行政处罚时,应当责令当事人改正或限期改正违法行为”。行政处罚,只是保证法律实施的一种手段,不是最终目的。对违法行为给予处罚,目的在于维护社会秩序。责令改正是行政主体责令违法行为人停止和纠正违法行为,以恢复原状,维持法定的秩序或状态。因此,在对违法行为人给予行政处罚的同时,还要责令行为人改正违法行为,不能以罚了事,让违法行为继续下去。 Article 23 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the “Administrative Punishment Law”) stipulates: “When administrative organs implement administrative penalties, they shall order the parties to correct or to correct the illegal acts within a specified period of time.” Administrative punishment is only a means of guaranteeing the law’s implementation and not the ultimate goal. Penalties for illegal activities, the purpose is to maintain social order. The ordering of corrections is that the administrative body shall order the illegal act person to stop and correct the illegal act so as to restore the status quo and maintain the legal order or status. Therefore, while giving administrative punishments to those who violate the law, they must also order the perpetrator to correct the illegal act and can not punish the criminal matter for the illegal act to continue.
其他文献
对于社会历史中所存在的决定论与非决定论观点,多方学者持有不同观点,并且长期以来对于两种理论的争执相持不下,赞成历史决定论观点的学者认为历史中存在着必然性与规律性,而对于
本文首先论述了体系结构研究的重要性 ,简要综述了体系结构研究的 4个发展阶段 ,并提出了研究体系结构的谱系概念 .在空间结构的研究中 ,提出了 5个视图与 9种过程流的描述方