论文部分内容阅读
目的分析静脉麻醉下人工流产对患者术后恢复及避孕的影响。方法 80例实施人工流产患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,各40例。观察组自愿选择静脉麻醉下的人工流产,对照组自愿选择普通人工流产。比较两组患者术中的疼痛程度、手术时间、术后阴道流血时间、发热、腹痛、B超检查结果、流产后避孕措施。结果两组患者在各疼痛程度方面及手术时间方面比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后3周,对两组患者进行随访,比较两组患者的术后阴道流血时间、发热、腹痛、B超检查结果 ,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后,两组患者在避孕措施选择方面基本一致(P>0.05)。结论静脉麻醉下的人工流产患者术中痛感方面优于普通人工流产,不影响患者流产后选择避孕方法。
Objective To analyze the effect of artificial abortion under intravenous anesthesia on postoperative recovery and contraception. Methods 80 cases of induced abortion patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 40 cases each. The observation group voluntarily chose artificial abortion under intravenous anesthesia and the control group voluntarily chose ordinary induced abortion. The degree of pain, operation time, postoperative vaginal bleeding time, fever, abdominal pain, B ultrasound examination results, postpartum contraception measures were compared between the two groups. Results There was significant difference in the degree of pain and operation time between the two groups (P <0.05). After 3 weeks, the two groups were followed up. The postoperative vaginal bleeding time, fever , Abdominal pain and B-ultrasound, the difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). After the operation, the two groups of patients were basically consistent in the choice of contraceptive measures (P> 0.05). Conclusion Intravenous anesthesia induced pain in patients with intraoperative pain is superior to ordinary abortion, does not affect the choice of contraception method after abortion.