论文部分内容阅读
如何处理公正审判同新闻自由间的矛盾是无论何种形式的司法系统都面临着的一个挑战。本文将目光投向了时常被主流文献所忽略的大陆法国家规制庭审前新闻报道的立法与司法实践,着重介绍了这些国家对于诉讼参与人个人名誉与尊严的保护。通过对美国的协调方法、英国的保护主义模式,以及欧洲大陆国家禁止的立场的比较分析,为各国在新闻自由、司法公正和诉讼参与人的人格利益中找到一种合理的平衡提供了一个全新的视角。
How to deal with the conflict between fair trial and freedom of the press is a challenge that no matter what kind of judicial system it is. This article focuses on the legislative and judicial practice of pre-trial press coverage in mainland France, often overlooked by mainstream literature, highlighting the protection of the individual’s honor and dignity by those countries. A comparative analysis of the coordination methods in the United States, the protectionist model in Britain and the forbidden positions of European countries has provided a brand new nation for finding a reasonable balance among freedom of the press, judicial fairness and personal interests of litigants Perspective.