在专利授权、确权案件的司法审判实践中,证据的认定直是广受关注的一个问题。其中公知常识类证据的认定不仅涉及程序性规定,在一定程度上还可能决定案件的实体处理结果,例如国家知识产权局专利复审委员会(简称专利复审委员会)以某项区别特徵为公知常识从而否定一项专利权创造性时,法院是否采信该公知常识就将直接决定案件的审理结果。本文将以司法实践中的具体案例为线索,尝试对专利授权、确 In the practice of judicial trial of patent authorization and confirmation cases, the identification of evidence is always a problem of widespread concern. Among them, it is known that the common knowledge of common law not only involves the procedural provisions but also may determine the substantive result of the case to a certain extent. For example, the Patent Reexamination Board of the State Intellectual Property Office (the Patent Reexamination Board for short) denies a certain distinctive feature as common knowledge When a patent is inventive, whether the court adopts the common sense will directly determine the outcome of the case. This article will take the specific case of judicial practice as a clue, trying to grant patents, indeed