张迪梅同志在《外语电化教学》1987年第3期发表了题为《正确处理电视教材中语言与图像的关系》一文,读后受益匪浅。文中充分肯定了语言在电视教材中的重要作用,也提出了一些独到见解。目前,某些同志在编制电视教材时,有重画面,轻解说的倾向。作者提出了这一值得注意的问题,理论上值得探讨,实践上也有一定现实意义。这一探讨本身,也是电化教育不断深入发展的标志。然而,作者在阐述这一问题时,多有偏颇。现提些粗浅看法,和张迪梅同志商榷,求教于大家。画面和解说究竟是什么关系?作者只下了个空泛、模糊的结论:“应以语言与图像作为相辅相成的一个整体,才是电视教材中两个要素真正的辩证关系。”怎样才能形成这种关系,未作出明确回答。我们认为,要探讨两者关系,必须明确它们在电视教材 Comrade Zhang DiMei in the “foreign language teaching” in 1987 the third issue entitled “correctly handle the relationship between language and image of teaching materials,” a text, after reading a lot of benefits. The article fully affirmed the important role of language in television teaching materials, also made some unique insights. At present, some comrades have a tendency to redraw and explain their tenets when compiling television teaching materials. The author puts forward this noteworthy issue, which is worth discussing in theory and has some practical significance in practice. This discussion itself is also a sign of the deepening development of electrified education. However, the author is biased in explaining this issue. Now make some superficial comments, and Comrade Zhang Dumei to discuss, ask everyone. What is the relationship between the picture and the explanation? The author only made a vague, vague conclusion: “Language and image as a whole should complement each other, is the two elements of teaching materials, the real dialectical relationship.” How to form this Relationship, did not make a clear answer. We think that to explore the relationship between the two, we must clarify their teaching materials on television