论文部分内容阅读
2012年修订的《民事诉讼法》吸收了司法实践中长期存在的检察建议制度,将其上升到法律规范的层面,使之成为了与抗诉相并列的检察机关的法律监督手段之一。检察建议与抗诉在性质功能、适用条件、法律效力等方面均存在着较大的不同,新修订的《民事诉讼法》对其的规定过于原则化和粗疏化,难以为检察机关在实践中正确地运用这一检察监督方式提供指引。应当在明确立法者的制度设计初衷的基础之上,发挥检察建议的比较优势,协调其与抗诉之间的关系,从而实现民事检察监督体系的良好运行。
The Civil Procedure Law revised in 2012 has absorbed the long-standing procuratorial suggestion system in judicial practice and raised it to the level of legal norms, making it one of the means of legal supervision of procuratorial organs that are tied with the protest. Prosecutorial proposals and protests are quite different in nature and function, applicable conditions, legal effects and other aspects. The newly revised Civil Procedure Law regulates the provisions of the Civil Procedure Law too much and is not suitable for the procuratorial organs in practice Use this method of procuratorial supervision to provide guidance. On the basis of clarifying the original intention of the legislator’s system design, the procurators should give full play to the comparative advantages of procuratorial proposals and coordinate their relationship with the protest so as to realize the sound operation of the civil procuratorial and supervisory system.