论文部分内容阅读
本刊2013年1月上半月刊发表的《博士刘卫民:我为何状告教育部》一文,报道了刘卫民要求确认教育部逾期不作为违法并要求履行法定职责一案。2012年12月20日,北京市第一中级人民法院判决刘卫民胜诉。具体判决如下:第一,确认被告教育部针对刘卫民的行政复议申请未在法定期限内作出处理决定违法;第二,判令被告教育部在本判决生效后30日内,依法对刘卫民的行政复议申请作出处理。案件受理费50元,由被告教育部负担。截至本稿发排,教育部未提出上诉。
The article published in the first half of January 2013, “Dr. Liu Weimin: Why did I sue the Ministry of Education,” a text that reported Liu Weimin’s request to confirm the Ministry of Education overdue illegal acts and required to fulfill their statutory duties. December 20, 2012, Beijing First Intermediate People’s Court ruling Liu Weimin won. The specific verdicts are as follows: First, it is confirmed that the defendant’s application for administrative reconsideration against Liu Weimin has not been handled within the statutory time limit. Second, the defendant was ordered to order the defendant to apply for Liu Weimin’s administrative reconsideration within 30 days from the effective date of this verdict Deal with it. Case admissibility fee 50 yuan, by the defendant Ministry of Education. As of this draft, the Ministry of Education did not appeal.