论文部分内容阅读
违约责任是否可以引发精神损害请求权,理论界争议很大。我国立法并未明确规定。从国外的立法及判例来看,将精神损害赔偿扩大至合同领域的趋势日益明显和扩大。依据精神损害存在于特定违约场合的客观性、责任竞合理论救济的不完全性、精神损害的可预见性,违约导致的精神损害应当予以赔偿。
Whether liability for breach of contract can trigger the claim of moral damage is a controversial issue in theorists. Our country’s legislation does not specify. Judging from foreign legislation and jurisprudence, the trend of extending compensation for mental damages to the field of contract has become increasingly evident and widened. According to the spirit damage to the objectivity of the existence of a specific breach of contract, the theory of liability co-operation remedy is not complete, the predictability of mental damage, breach of contract caused by mental damage should be compensated.