沉重的木牌——关于“华人与狗不得入内”问题争论的前前后后

来源 :党史文汇 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:guoke3zhang
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
在中国的土地上,从白发皓首的老人到胸前飘着红领巾的少年儿童,几乎无不知晓这一段关于我们民族的历史:当年在上海租界地有一个外滩公园,公园的门口矗着一块木牌,牌子上赫然写着“华人与狗不得入内”…… 这是一段铭记着民族耻辱的历史,祖辈讲给父辈,父辈讲给我们。我们知道这块木牌的沉重,沉重到整个中华民族曾被帝国主义列强欺压凌辱得扭曲流泪;我们懂得历史不能忘记,尘封的岁月终究掩盖不住历史的真相。 然而,在1994年春天,上海史学界就这块沉重的木牌是否真实存在过,引发了一场争论。争论虽已划上句号,但它给人们的思考却远远超出了史学界,超出了本牌本身。因此,我们专门约请徐国梁、虞骁同志撰写此文,献给热爱中华的广大读者。 On the Chinese land, almost all the children aged 10 to 10 were learning about the history of our nation from the elders of Haifa Haishou to the children with red scarves on their chests: there was a Bund Park in the concession in Shanghai that year, Brand, brand impressively said “Chinese and dogs shall not be admitted” ... This is a history of bearing in mind the national shame, my grandfather told my parents, my father told us. We know that this wooden sign is so heavy and so heavy that the entire Chinese nation has been distorted and shed tears of oppression by the imperialist powers. We know that history can not be forgotten and the dusty years can not conceal the truth of history. However, in the spring of 1994, the debate among Shanghai’s historians over the existence of this heavy wooden sign was triggered. Although the debate has been put to an end, the thinking it gives to people goes far beyond the historical circle beyond the card itself. Therefore, we specifically invite Xu Guoliang and Comrade Yu Xiao to write this article for the readers who love China.
其他文献
自战国中后期到西汉,道家均为黄老道家。道家诸子言道以干预时政,黄学入老更加强化了政治思想,形成了道法结合,刑、名、德互补具有综合特性的黄老道家。“君人南面之术”是贯
2017年6月22日晚,“忠诚诵”第五届“夏青杯”朗诵大赛公安赛区总决赛颁奖仪式在广西壮族自治区公安厅礼堂隆重举行。  全国公安文联副主席、第五届“夏青杯”朗诵大赛公安赛区组委会主任王亚茹,公安部宣传局巡视员、全国公安作协副主席、全国公安文联秘書长、第五届“夏青杯”朗诵大赛公安赛区组委会副主任杨锦,广西壮族自治区副主席、公安厅党委书记、厅长胡焯,广西壮族自治区党委宣传部副部长宋震寰,广西文联副主席