论文部分内容阅读
目的对比切开引流术与一次性根治术对小儿肛周脓肿的临床疗效。方法 84例肛周脓肿患儿,按随机数字表将其分为对照组和实验组,每组42例。对照组行切开引流术,实验组行一次性根治术。对比两组临床治疗效果及愈合时间。结果实验组总有效率100.00%,明显高于对照组90.48%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。然而,对照组愈合时间(9.05±2.14)d明显短于实验组(12.42±2.31)d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论采用一次性根治术治疗小儿肛周脓肿具有临床疗效佳的优点。
Objective To compare the clinical curative effect of incision drainage and one-time radical operation on pediatric perianal abscess. Methods 84 cases of perianal abscess children, according to random number table divided into control group and experimental group, 42 cases in each group. The control group underwent incision and drainage, and the experimental group underwent radical radical operation. Compare the two groups of clinical treatment and healing time. Results The total effective rate in the experimental group was 100.00%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (90.48%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). However, the healing time of the control group (9.05 ± 2.14) d was significantly shorter than that of the experimental group (12.42 ± 2.31) d, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.01). Conclusion The one-time radical operation for the treatment of pediatric perianal abscess has the advantage of good clinical efficacy.