论文部分内容阅读
就近期美国联邦最高法院Mayo v. Prometheus一案的判决,对美国《专利法》第101条“专利适格标的”产生的影响进行了研究。对Mayo基本案情进行介绍后,梳理了近年来美国《专利法》第101条专利适格标的范围及其检测标准的变化,指出美国专利标的物范围一直缺乏清晰、明确的界定;专利适格标的检测方法虽历经多次变革,但始终无法形成一个统一、清晰的检测标准。从法律功能、专利效力、产业发展等角度,分析了Mayo案件判决产生的影响,并就企业创新成果的保护、专利申请提出了建议。
In a recent judgment in Mayo v. Prometheus, the Supreme Court of the United States, the impact of Article 101 of the Patent Law of the United States on the subject of “patent eligibility criteria” was studied. After introducing the basic case of Mayo, this paper combs the changes of the scope of the eligibility criteria and the testing standards of Article 101 of the Patent Law of the United States in recent years, and points out that the scope of the U.S. patent subject matter has been lack of a clear and definite definition. Although the detection method has undergone many changes, it has not been able to form a unified and clear test standard. From the perspective of legal function, patent effect and industrial development, this paper analyzes the impact of Mayo case judgment, and puts forward suggestions on the protection of patent innovation and enterprise application.