英国错判的证明标准包括三个层次:第一,刑事案件复查委员会决定移送案件的证明标准是“具有推翻原判的真实可能性”;第二,上诉法院决定撤销原判的证明标准是“新证据足以构成对有罪判决的合理怀疑”;第三,法院决定错判赔偿的证明标准是“证据不可能再导致有罪判决”对于一段时期以来媒体上报道的错案,我认为,“错案难翻”的原因之一是有关人员对认定错判的证明标准的误解——既包括错误的理解也包括错误的解释,而其背后隐含的可能是有关人员对错案责任追究的恐惧乃至抗拒。刑事案件中的事实认定并非 The standard of proof of wrong judgment in England includes three levels: first, the standard of proof that the Criminal Case Review Committee decides to transfer the case is “the real possibility of overturning the original judgment ”; secondly, the Court of Appeal decided to withdraw the original standard of proof Is “new evidence is sufficient to constitute a reasonable doubt about the guilty verdict”; thirdly, the standard of proof that the court decided to misjudge the compensation is “evidence can not lead to a guilty verdict again.” For the wrong case reported by the media for a period of time, I The author believes that one of the reasons why “the wrong case is difficult to turn over” is one of the reasons why the relevant personnel misunderstand the standard of proof for the wrongful judgment - both the wrong understanding and the wrong explanation, Accountability of fear and even resist. The factual determination in criminal cases is not