论文部分内容阅读
在我国,最早运用诉前保全措施的是海事审判。1984年11月,上海海事法院参照国际惯例,对在黄浦江拖锚航行勾断“南浦383”号水底电缆的巴拿马籍“阿加未能”轮果断采取诉前扣船措施,取得了巨大成功。此后,诉前扣船(包括扣押船载货物)逐渐在海事审判中得到普遍应用,并由最高人民法院以司法解释的形式作出肯定和具体规定(见1986年1月31日最高人民法院《关于诉讼前扣押船舶的具体规定》)。在总结司法实践经验尤其是海事司法实践经验的基础上,新民诉法对诉前保全管理作出明确规定,得到了法学理论界和司法界的一致认同。然而,由于新民诉法第93条关于诉前保全的规定过于简略,下述问题仍有进一步探讨的必要。
In our country, the earliest use of pre-trial preservation measures is maritime trial. In November 1984, in accordance with international conventions, the Shanghai Maritime Court made a great success in taking the pre-victual arrest measures against the Panamanian “Aga Failed” round of the anchor of the “Nanpu 383” underwater cable towed on the Huangpu River . Since then, the lawsuit arrest (including the seizure of ship’s cargo) has been gradually applied in maritime trials and affirmed and specified by the Supreme People’s Court in the form of judicial interpretation (see Supreme Court on January 31, 1986, Specific rules for the seizure of ships before litigation "). On the basis of summing up the judicial practice experience, especially the experience of maritime judicial practice, the new civil prosecution law clearly stipulates the pre-trial preservation management and has been unanimously approved by the jurisprudential and judicial circles. However, since the provisions of Article 93 of the New Civil Procedure Law on pre-trial preservation are too simplistic, the following issues still need to be further explored.