甲:近年来,你常常强调继承弘扬优秀中华传统文化必须通过群众性的古为今用。但过去却没听你这么说过,不知你从什么时候开始才有这种想法?乙:我曾长期从事中国古代文学的教学与研究工作,一直认为评估与考证既是传承弘扬的前提,也是工作的主要内容。你不评估,怎么确定何者是精华,何者是糟粕?你不考证,怎么知道文本的真伪,解释的正误?但是,评估考证做了几十年,却发现这些工作只是专家学者在做,而且争论不休,没完没了……甲:作为学术研究,争论不休是正常的。但有 A: In recent years, you often emphasize the importance of inheriting the excellent traditional Chinese culture through the masses’ past and present. But in the past did not hear you say so, I do not know when you have this idea? B: I have long been engaged in the teaching of ancient Chinese literature and research work, has always been that the assessment and research is not only the prerequisite of inheritance and promotion, but also work The main content. You do not assess, how to determine what is the essence, what is the dross? You do not textual research, how to know the authenticity of the text, correct interpretation? However, evaluation of the research done for decades, but found that these are just experts and scholars are doing, and Endless debate, endless ... A: As an academic research, endless debate is normal. But there