论文部分内容阅读
双边投资协定谈判可分为“规则谈判”与“减让谈判”。规则是原则的表现和减让的基础、规则是义务的“质”的规定,而减让只是义务的“量”的规定,在缺少多边国际投资条约的情况下,双边投资协定将以其规则塑造未来的多边国际投资体制,因此,协定的规则谈判重于减让谈判。就中美双边投资协定谈判而言,由于该项谈判将在很大程度上影响着未来的国际投资法律体制的创建、影响未来的国际经济秩序对“中国模式”的容忍程度并考验中国政府构建“制度性权力”的能力,所以,中美双边投资协定谈判不应急于从规则谈判转向减让谈判。
Bilateral investment agreement negotiations can be divided into “rule negotiation ” and “concession negotiation ”. The rules are the basis for the performance of the principle and the concession. The rule is the “quality” of the obligation, while the concession is only the “quantity” of the obligation. In the absence of the multilateral investment treaty, the bilateral investment agreement The future multilateral investment regime will be shaped by its rules, so the negotiated rules of the agreement will be more important than the concession negotiations. As far as the Sino-U.S. Bilateral Investment Agreement negotiations are concerned, the negotiation will greatly affect the future establishment of the international investment law system and affect the tolerance of the future international economic order toward the “China Model” and test China Therefore, the negotiation of Sino-U.S. Bilateral Investment Agreements should not urgently shift from rule-making to concession-negotiation.