论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨应用悬浮床与气悬床在治疗大面积烧伤患者时的临床疗效的差异。方法:将2003年至2011年我科收治的大面积烧伤患者45例随机分为研究组和对照组,其中研究组23例患者卧悬浮床进行治疗,对照组22例卧气悬床,在其他治疗方案均相同的情况下,分别观察对比两组患者的细菌培养阳性率、创面脓毒血症例数、平均治愈天数三个方面,并进行统计学处理。结果:45例患者全部存活,两组患者的指标对比有统计学意义(P<0.01或P<0.05)结论:应用悬浮床治疗大面积烧伤,在缩短治疗天数,降低感染率,提高大面积烧伤救治成功率方面比应用气悬床效果明显。
Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of suspended bed and aerosol bed in the treatment of large area burn patients. Methods: Forty-five patients with extensive burns treated in our department from 2003 to 2011 were randomly divided into study group and control group. Among them, 23 patients in research group were treated with lying bed, The same treatment programs were observed and compared two groups of patients were positive rates of bacterial culture, the number of cases of sepsis wounds, the average number of days to cure, and statistical analysis. Results: All the 45 patients survived. The indexes of the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.01 or P <0.05). Conclusion: The application of the suspended bed in the treatment of large area burn can shorten the treatment days, reduce the infection rate and increase the area burn Rescue success rate than the application of aerodynamic canopy effect.