古代蒙古的民族与国家的形成 ,传统的说法是由氏族部落、部落联盟发展而成。这个说法缺少一个重要环节 ,那就是宗族 (或家族 )部族阶段。西方学者在上个世纪六七十年代提出了被一些国内学者所接受的“酋邦”说 ,似乎看到并论述了宗族 (或家族 )部族政权的存在。但“酋邦”说概括不了宗族 (或家族 )部族政权的性质和形成的原因。笔者从历史史实和逻辑推理两个方面 ,论证了蒙古族是在氏族部落解体之后出现的深刻分化、彼此迁徙和重新整合的过程中 ,形成了众多的宗族 (或家族 )部族的社会政治组织。在这些宗族 (或家族 )部族政权的对抗与兼并的过程中 ,正是始终重视家族或宗族领导核心的帖木真 ,通过统一战争和创建千户制组织的形式 ,完成了民族的统一和国家的建立 The formation of the ancient Mongolian nation and state, the traditional argument is by clan tribes, tribal alliance developed. This argument lacks an important part, that clan (or clan) tribal stage. Western scholars proposed “chiefdom” accepted by some domestic scholars in the 1960s and 1970s as if they saw and discussed the existence of clan (or clan) tribal regimes. But the “chiefdom” theory can not sum up the nature and formation of clan (or family) tribal regimes. From historical facts and logical reasoning, the author demonstrates that the Mongolian community formed a large number of clans (or clan) tribal socio-political organizations in the process of profound divisions, migration and reintegration between clan tribes after their dissolution. In the course of the confrontation and annexation of these clan (or clan) tribal regimes, it is precisely Timjan who has always attached importance to the core of the clan or clan leadership. Through the war of unity and the establishment of a thousand-household system, the unity of the nation and the state The establishment of