论文部分内容阅读
无论从理论上还是从立法实践上来看,单位均不具备证人资格。然而,同案被告人、生理及精神上有缺陷和年幼的人、警察、鉴定人以及见证人,由于其具有同证人作证相同的本质特征,如果将其排除在律师伪证罪的对象范围之外,显然与刑法平等性的实质内涵相违背。因此,律师通过威胁、引诱等手段获得违背事实的证言,在符合律师伪证罪其他构成要件的前提下,应当受到刑事追诉。
No matter in theory or from the legislative practice point of view, the units do not have the witness qualifications. However, co-defendants, physically and mentally-challenged and young persons, police, appraisers and witnesses who, because of their identical essential characteristics as witnesses, are excluded from the scope of the perpetrator’s perjury , Apparently contrary to the substantive connotation of the equality of criminal law. Therefore, the lawyer obtains the testimony that violates the facts through threatening, inducing and other means, and should be subject to criminal prosecution on the premise of meeting the other components of the lawyer’s perjury.