论文部分内容阅读
在网络文学评价标准问题上,“普遍文学标准说”将精英文学标准不恰当地套用于网络文学;“通俗文学标准说”人为拉低了网络文学的价值和功能;“综合多维标准说”有割裂网络文学整体存在的倾向。建构网络文学批评标准需要采用合理的价值预设和历史性、语境化的原则。在新媒介时代可以“倾向”或“根据”文学活动的媒介要素,建构出契合网络文学批评需要的“媒介存在论”批评。媒介存在论的网络文学评价标准,由网络生成性尺度、技术性—艺术性—商业性融合尺度、跨媒介及跨艺类尺度、“虚拟世界”开拓尺度、主体网络间性与合作生产尺度、“数字此在”对存在意义领悟尺度等多尺度的系统整体构成。
On the standard of network literature evaluation, “the standard of universal literary theory” inappropriately applies the standard of the elite literature to online literature; “the standard of popular literature says” artificially lowers the value and function of network literature; “ Multidimensional standards that ”There is a tendency to split the overall existence of online literature. The construction of network literary criticism standards need to adopt a reasonable value default and historic, contextualized principles. In the era of new media, we can construct “media existentialism” criticism in line with the needs of online literary criticism based on the media elements of literary activities. The media ontology evaluation criterion of online literature consists of the dimensions of network generativeness, technicality - artisticness - commercial integration, cross - media and cross - arts, the development of “virtual world”, the inter - network nature and the scale of cooperative production, “The number is here ” For the existential sense of comprehension scale and other multi-scale system as a whole composition.